GEO Readiness Score: can ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews cite your site?

01 / Audit

The GEO readiness audit.

Answer for your site as it is today. The answers start preset to a typical small business, so you can see a result first.

A Access25

B Entity15

C Answers20

D Evidence20

E Off-site20

Your scoreEdition 1

46of 100

Verdict

Partly visible

An assistant can probably find you, but it has little reason to quote you over a competitor. Work through the fixes in order.

PillarPoints

ACrawlability and access21.9 / 25

BEntity clarity and consistency10.0 / 15

CAnswer-first content5.0 / 20

DEvidence3.3 / 20

EOff-site signals5.5 / 20

Fix first, by impact against effortGain

01Cite named, linkable sources for the claims on your top pages.D2 · Evidence · Low effort+5.0
02Show a named author or reviewer, with role or credentials, on key pages.D4 · Evidence · Low effort+3.3
03Open each key page with a direct answer of 40 to 60 words.C1 · Answers · Medium effort+5.0
04Publish pages for cost, comparison and how-to-choose questions.C4 · Answers · Medium effort+5.0
05Add quotes from named experts, clients or third parties.D3 · Evidence · Medium effort+5.0
06Earn mentions on credible third-party sites: trade press, associations, partners.E1 · Off-site · High effort+5.5
07Get included in independent best-of lists, comparisons and roundups.E4 · Off-site · High effort+5.5
08Claim the main directory listings for your industry and city, with matching details.E3 · Off-site · Low effort+1.8

10 smaller fixes not shown. Gains are points out of 100.

How it scores. Each answer counts Yes as 1, Partly as 0.5, and No or Not sure as 0. Within a pillar, questions are weighted by impact (1 to 3), and each pillar contributes its weight to a total of 100. Why these weights: access gets 25 because nothing else counts if crawlers cannot read the page, and the vendors document exactly how their bots behave.³⁸ Evidence and off-site signals get 20 each because they have the strongest published support: a controlled test for evidence¹ and large observational studies for third-party mentions.¹²² Answer-first content gets 20 because it is what an engine lifts, though no public test isolates it. Entity clarity gets 15 because its case rests on reasoning rather than tests. The gate: if A1 is No or Not sure, the score is capped at 30. The fix list ranks each gap by the points it would add divided by effort (1 low, 3 high). The weights are Clickhouse judgment from the evidence on this page, not a published standard. A high score raises your chances. It does not guarantee a citation, because each engine chooses its sources and the answers change from run to run.

02 / Figures

16 rows
15 Sourced
1 Confirm
Checked Oct 19, 2026

What is known, from the people who measured it.

Most GEO advice online is vendor blogs repeating each other. Every figure here is traced to the study, dataset or official documentation it came from. Where we could not confirm a claim at source, the row says Confirm.

Benchmark or rule	Value	Status
Citations, quotations and statistics, lab test	The authors report relative gains of about 30 to 40% for these methods on the study’s main measure of visibility in generated answers. Keyword stuffing scored below the unoptimized baseline. Aggarwal et al., KDD 2024.¹	Sourced
Who gains most from those edits	Lower-ranked pages. Citing sources lifted visibility 115.1% for pages ranked fifth, while top-ranked pages lost 30.3% on average.¹	Sourced
Whose content AI search cites	A 2025 study of AI search services found a strong, consistent preference for earned, third-party media over brand-owned and social content.²	Sourced
GPTBot (OpenAI)	Crawls content that may be used to train OpenAI’s models. Blocking it is a training opt-out, and does not remove you from ChatGPT search.³	Sourced
OAI-SearchBot and ChatGPT-User (OpenAI)	OAI-SearchBot surfaces sites in ChatGPT search, and sites that block it are left out of search answers. ChatGPT-User fetches pages when a user asks, and robots.txt rules may not apply to it.³	Sourced
ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User (Anthropic)	ClaudeBot collects training data. Claude-SearchBot indexes for search results. Claude-User fetches pages for a user’s question. Each is controlled separately in robots.txt.⁴	Sourced
PerplexityBot and Perplexity-User	PerplexityBot surfaces and links sites in Perplexity results and is not used for model training. Perplexity-User fetches pages for a user’s question and generally ignores robots.txt.⁵	Sourced
Google-Extended	A robots.txt token that controls use of your content for training Gemini models and for grounding. Google says it does not affect inclusion or ranking in Google Search.⁶	Sourced
Eligibility for Google AI Overviews and AI Mode	The page must be indexed and eligible to show with a snippet. Google says no special optimization, AI text file or schema.org markup is required, and the snippet controls nosnippet, data-nosnippet, max-snippet and noindex apply.⁷	Sourced
JavaScript rendering by AI crawlers	In Vercel’s December 2024 measurement, none of the major AI crawlers rendered JavaScript. Gemini (through Googlebot) and Applebot were the exceptions.⁸	Sourced
Clicks when Google shows an AI summary	Users clicked a traditional result on 8% of visits with an AI summary, against 15% without one, and clicked a link inside the summary on 1%. Pew Research Center, 900 US adults, March 2025.⁹	Sourced
Top-result click-through with an AI Overview	A 58% lower average click-through rate for the page ranked first in December 2025, compared with the rate Ahrefs forecast, from December 2023 data, had AI Overviews not launched. Ahrefs, 300,000 keywords, February 2026.¹⁰	Sourced
Organic click-through on AI Overview queries	Fell from 1.76% to 0.61% between June 2024 and September 2025. Brands cited in the overview had a 35% higher organic click-through rate (0.70% vs 0.52%) than those not cited, a correlation. Seer Interactive, 3,119 queries, November 2025.¹¹	Sourced
Signals linked to appearing in AI Overviews	Branded web mentions had the strongest correlation (0.664), ahead of branded anchors (0.527), branded search volume (0.392) and backlinks (0.218). Ahrefs, 75,000 brands, May 2025.¹²	Sourced
Reach of Google AI Overviews	2 billion monthly users, up from 1.5 billion in May 2025, as reported from Alphabet’s July 2025 earnings call.¹⁴	Sourced
Whether AI engines use llms.txt	llms.txt is a proposal from September 2024, not a standard.¹³ Google says no AI text file is needed for its AI features. We found no statement from OpenAI, Anthropic or Perplexity that their answers use it, and are checking.	Confirm

Sources

Aggarwal, Murahari, Rajpurohit, Kalyan, Narasimhan and Deshpande, “GEO: Generative Engine Optimization”, KDD 2024. arxiv.org/abs/2311.09735. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Chen, Wang, Chen and Koudas, “Generative Engine Optimization: How to Dominate AI Search”, September 2025. arxiv.org/abs/2509.08919. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
OpenAI, “Overview of OpenAI crawlers” (GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ChatGPT-User). developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Anthropic Help Center, article on ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot and Claude-User and how to block them. support.claude.com/en/articles/8896518. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Perplexity, “Perplexity crawlers” (PerplexityBot, Perplexity-User). docs.perplexity.ai/guides/bots. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Google Search Central, “Google’s common crawlers”, entry for Google-Extended. developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/google-common-crawlers. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Google Search Central, “AI features and your website”, last updated December 10, 2025. developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Vercel, “The rise of the AI crawler”, December 17, 2024. vercel.com/blog/the-rise-of-the-ai-crawler. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Pew Research Center, “Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results”, July 22, 2025. pewresearch.org, July 2025. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Ahrefs, “Update: AI Overviews Reduce Clicks by 58%”, February 4, 2026. ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overviews-reduce-clicks-update. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Seer Interactive, “AIO impact on Google CTR: September 2025 update”, November 4, 2025. seerinteractive.com/insights/aio-impact-on-google-ctr-september-2025-update. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Ahrefs, “An Analysis of AI Overview Brand Visibility Factors (75K Brands Studied)”, May 26, 2025. ahrefs.com/blog/ai-overview-brand-correlation. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
Jeremy Howard, “The /llms.txt file”, a proposal first published September 3, 2024. llmstxt.org. Checked Oct 19, 2026.
TechCrunch, report of Alphabet’s Q2 2025 earnings call: AI Overviews at 2 billion monthly users, July 23, 2025. techcrunch.com, July 2025. Checked Oct 19, 2026.

03 / Evidence

Clickhouse synthesis
October 19, 2026
13 claims graded

The GEO evidence ledger: what is tested, and what is folklore.

We took the thirteen claims we hear most from clients and graded each one by the best public evidence we could trace to its origin. This is our synthesis, not a new study, and the grades will move as better evidence appears.

ClaimGradeWhat the evidence says

Adding statistics, quotations and cited sources gets you quoted more.TestedThe strongest result in the field: 30 to 40% gains in a controlled test across 10,000 queries, partly confirmed on Perplexity.¹ Limits: 2023 and 2024 models, and one live engine.

AI answers cut clicks to websites.MeasuredThree independent datasets agree on the direction: Pew’s browsing panel, Ahrefs’ Search Console data and Seer’s client data.⁹¹⁰¹¹ The size varies with the method.

AI crawlers see the page the way a visitor does.ContradictedOpenAI’s and Anthropic’s crawlers fetched JavaScript files but did not run them.⁸ Text added by scripts after load may never be read.

Blocking GPTBot keeps you out of ChatGPT answers.ContradictedOpenAI documents GPTBot as its training crawler. ChatGPT search uses OAI-SearchBot, a separate user agent with its own robots.txt rule.³

Blocking Google-Extended takes you out of AI Overviews.ContradictedGoogle says Google-Extended does not affect Search, and that AI Overviews follow the normal Search controls: Googlebot access and snippet rules.⁶⁷

You need special schema markup or an AI text file for AI Overviews.ContradictedGoogle states that neither is required.⁷ Structured data can still state your facts clearly, which is why the audit gives it a low weight, not zero.

Keyword stuffing for AI prompts helps.ContradictedIt scored below the unoptimized baseline in the controlled test, and about 10% worse than baseline on the main measure on Perplexity.¹

Third-party mentions matter more than your own pages.CorrelationalWeb mentions are the signal most linked to AI Overview visibility across 75,000 brands, and AI search leans on earned media.¹²² Neither study proves cause.

Being cited in an AI Overview wins clicks back.CorrelationalCited brands had a 35% higher organic click-through rate (0.70% vs 0.52%) than uncited ones.¹¹ Seer itself notes that stronger brands may simply be cited more often.

Opening with a short, direct answer gets you quoted.ReasonedEngines quote passages, so a self-contained answer is easy to lift. No public controlled test isolates the effect yet. We think it is sound practice, and say so.

Named authors and credentials raise AI citations.ReasonedIt helps readers judge a claim and costs little. We found no public test of its effect on AI citations.

Fresh dates on a page get it cited more.UncheckedVendor studies claim AI engines prefer recent content. We have not traced one to a method we could check, so this is unconfirmed. The audit weights it lowest.

An llms.txt file gets you cited.UnsupportedIt is a proposal, and Google says it is not needed.¹³⁷ We publish one for every Clickhouse tool site because it is cheap, not because it is proven.

Grades:Tested: controlled experimentMeasured: large observational dataContradicted: tested or documented as falseCorrelational: linked, cause unprovenReasoned: logic, no public testUnchecked or Unsupported: no evidence we could verify

Method. For each claim we looked for the original experiment, dataset or platform documentation, read it, and graded the claim by the strongest of those we could open. Secondary articles were used only to find originals. Every source is listed under the figures table.

Limits. AI engines change their models and source selection often, so documented behavior can change between editions. Lab results may not transfer to every engine. We will re-check each grade at every quarterly edition.

04 / Explained

Five pillars
Three kinds of bot
When to skip GEO

Five pillars, in plain terms.

Generative engine optimization is not a new trick. It is the work of being reachable, recognizable and worth quoting, for systems that write an answer instead of listing ten links.

AWeight 25

Access

Can the bot read the page?

Search crawlers allowed in robots.txt and the firewall, text in the served HTML, pages indexed. If this fails, nothing else on the list matters.

BWeight 15

Entity

Is it clear who you are?

One name, one address, one description, everywhere. An engine that finds “Harbor Dental” and “Harbour Dental Studio LLC” may think it found two businesses.

CWeight 20

Answers

Is there a passage to lift?

A direct answer in the first lines, headings that match real questions, prices and timelines in text. Engines quote passages, not whole pages.

DWeight 20

Evidence

Is it worth quoting?

Specific numbers, named sources, quotations from real people, a named author and a date. This is where the controlled evidence is strongest.

EWeight 20

Off-site

Do others vouch for you?

Press, trade bodies, reviews, directories and independent roundups. AI search leans on what others say about you more than on what you say.

×The limit

No promise

What no audit can do

Each engine picks its sources and changes them between runs. A high score improves your odds. Anyone who guarantees a ChatGPT citation is selling something they do not control.

Robots.txt

Training bots, search bots and user fetchers: what to allow.

Each AI company now runs several crawlers, and they do different jobs. Training bots collect text for future models: GPTBot, ClaudeBot and the Google-Extended token. Search bots build the index an assistant cites from: OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot and PerplexityBot.³⁴⁵ User fetchers visit a page because someone asked about it: ChatGPT-User and Perplexity-User, and robots.txt may not bind them.

Allow for visibility

OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot.

Googlebot, which also feeds AI Overviews.⁷

A business decision

GPTBot, ClaudeBot and Google-Extended. Blocking them is a training opt-out.

Blocking Google-Extended does not affect Google Search.⁶

The common mistake is not in robots.txt at all. Bot protection in a firewall or hosting plan often blocks unknown user agents by default. Check both, then confirm in your server logs that the search bots are getting pages back.

The research

What the GEO study tested, and what it did not.

The term generative engine optimization comes from a 2023 paper by researchers at Princeton University and IIT Delhi, presented at KDD 2024.¹ They rewrote source pages nine ways and measured how much of each page showed up in generated answers across a benchmark of 10,000 queries.

Citing sources, adding quotations and adding statistics scored highest. Keyword stuffing scored below the baseline.

The gains were largest for pages that ranked lower to begin with, which is good news for smaller businesses. A later study found AI search engines lean heavily on earned, third-party media.² Read both with care: the models tested are older than today’s, and most tests ran on a research engine, not on ChatGPT or AI Overviews. They show what tends to work, not what is guaranteed.

Honest framing

When GEO is not your priority yet.

GEO builds on ordinary search foundations. If those are missing, fix them first, because AI features mostly draw on the same indexes.⁷ Skip GEO for now if:

Your site is not indexed, or gets almost no search traffic at all. Start with indexing and the basics.
You have no Google Business Profile and you serve a local area. That listing comes first.
Your offer is unclear. If customers cannot say what you do and for whom, no engine can either.
Nearly all your work comes from referrals and you have no capacity for more. Visibility you cannot serve costs you.
Your buyers do not research online, for example a closed trade network. Put the budget where they are.

For everyone else, the first pillar is usually an hour of work and the most valuable hour on the list.

05 / Examples

Three sites
Scored with this audit
Composite cases

Three businesses, three different first fixes.

Illustrative composites, not clients, each scored with the tool above.

Dental practice · Boston, MA

Great reviews, thin pages

44to 64 after four fixes

Crawlers get in and the Google Business Profile is strong, with 300 reviews. But the service pages say “affordable, gentle care”, with no prices, no sources and no named dentist. Evidence scores 1.7 of 20 and answers 1.7 of 20.

First fixesPrices and timelines in text, sources for clinical claims, answer-first openings on the five main treatments, and a crown cost page. About 43 to 86 hours of writing on the planner’s estimates, and no development.

Employment law firm · London

Strong content, door shut

30to 84 after one fix

Named partners, cited case law, dated guides. Uncapped, it scores 78. But the hosting firewall blocks unknown bots, including OAI-SearchBot and PerplexityBot, so the gate caps it at 30. Engines that cannot fetch the guides cannot quote them.

First fixOne firewall rule and a robots.txt check, one to three hours. The score moves to 84 before a word of content changes.

Outdoor gear online store · Denver, CO

Products a crawler cannot see

45to 67 after five fixes

The storefront loads product names, specs and prices with JavaScript after the page opens, so an AI crawler that does not run scripts sees an empty template. Some categories are not indexed. Reviews and listings are in good shape.

First fixesPrerender product and category pages, fix indexing, then add specific specs, sources and buying-guide openings. The rendering work is the big item, 16 to 60 developer hours.

Phone

One-line description

Consistency

60% consistent

4 mismatches and 4 variants across 15 compared details. Fix mismatches first: they can make one business look like two.

Source	Business name	Address	Phone	Description
Google Business Profile	Variant	Match	Match	Match
LinkedIn page	Mismatch	Variant	Blank	Mismatch
Main directory	Match	Variant	Mismatch	Mismatch
Industry directory	Variant	Match	Match	Match

What to changeStatus

LinkedIn page, business name“Harbour Dental Studio LLC”. Does not match the website.Mismatch
LinkedIn page, one-line description“A modern dental practice focused on patient experience.” Describes the business differently (0% shared terms).Mismatch
Main directory, phone“(617) 555-0199”. Different number.Mismatch
Main directory, one-line description“Dentist in Boston offering cleanings, whitening and implants.” Describes the business differently (7% shared terms).Mismatch
Google Business Profile, business name“Harbor Dental Studio Back Bay”. Same name with words added or missing.Variant
LinkedIn page, address“Boston, MA”. Same address with parts missing.Variant
Main directory, address“210 Newbury St, Boston, MA 02116”. Same address with parts missing.Variant
Industry directory, business name“Harbor Dental”. Same name with words added or missing.Variant

How it compares. Your website is the reference. Names ignore case, punctuation and legal suffixes such as LLC or Ltd, and count as a variant when one contains the other. Addresses treat common abbreviations as equal (Street and St, Suite and Ste) and count as a variant when parts are missing. Phone numbers compare digits only, ignoring +1 and +44 prefixes. Descriptions compare shared meaningful words: 50% or more counts as consistent, 25% to 50% as drifted. A spelling difference such as Harbor and Harbour counts as a mismatch, because a machine may read it as a different business. Nothing you type leaves this page.

07 / Process

Four steps
About six months

From audit to cited, in four steps.

The technical work is quick. The evidence and the earned mentions take longer, and they are where most of the gains are.

Week 1

Audit and baseline

Score the site, then list 20 to 30 questions your buyers ask and record by hand what ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and AI Overviews answer today.

Run the questions by hand, from a clean browser, and save every answer with its date.

Weeks 2 to 3

Open the doors

Allow the AI search crawlers, get key text into the served HTML, fix indexing, and make the name, address and description identical everywhere.

Check server logs to confirm the search bots are getting pages back.

Weeks 3 to 8

Rebuild the answering pages

Answer-first openings, question headings, decision pages, and specific evidence with named sources and quotes on the ten pages that matter most.

One page done well beats ten pages touched lightly.

Months 2 to 6

Earn mentions and re-measure

Reviews, directories, trade press and independent roundups. Re-run the same buyer questions each month and compare with the baseline.

Expect variation between runs. Judge the trend over months, not a single answer.

08 / Questions

14 questions
Plain answers

Ask one we missed →

What owners ask about AI search.

01What is generative engine optimization (GEO)?

GEO is the work of making your website easy for AI systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews to find, understand and quote when they write an answer. The term comes from a 2023 research paper presented at KDD 2024. In practice it covers crawler access, a consistent business identity, answer-first pages, specific evidence and mentions on other sites.

02How do I get my business recommended by ChatGPT?

Make sure OAI-SearchBot can crawl your site, publish pages that answer your buyers’ questions directly with specific facts, keep your business details identical everywhere, and earn mentions on credible third-party sites. None of this guarantees a recommendation, because ChatGPT chooses its sources, but each step removes a reason to leave you out.

03Is GEO different from SEO?

It builds on SEO rather than replacing it. Google says AI Overviews draw on pages that are indexed and eligible for a snippet, so search foundations still come first. GEO adds more weight on quotable passages, cited evidence and what other sites say about you, and it measures success in citations and mentions as well as rankings and clicks.

04Should I block GPTBot in robots.txt?

It is a business decision. OpenAI documents GPTBot as the crawler that collects training data, so blocking it opts you out of training. It does not remove you from ChatGPT search, which uses a separate crawler, OAI-SearchBot. If you want to appear in ChatGPT answers, keep OAI-SearchBot allowed whatever you decide about GPTBot.

05Does blocking Google-Extended remove my site from AI Overviews?

No. Google says Google-Extended controls use of your content for Gemini training and grounding, and does not affect inclusion or ranking in Google Search. AI Overviews follow the normal Search controls: Googlebot access in robots.txt, and snippet rules such as nosnippet and max-snippet.

06Do I need an llms.txt file for AI search?

Not as far as anyone has shown. llms.txt is a September 2024 proposal for a plain-text guide to a site. Google says no AI text file is needed for its AI features, and we found no statement from OpenAI, Anthropic or Perplexity that their answers use it. It costs little to publish one, so we do, but do not expect it to change your visibility.

07Does schema markup help me show up in AI Overviews?

Google says there is no special schema.org markup you need for AI Overviews or AI Mode. Organization or LocalBusiness markup still states your name, address and official profiles in a machine-readable form, which supports a consistent identity. Treat it as tidy housekeeping, not a ranking lever.

08Can ChatGPT and Perplexity read JavaScript websites?

Often not fully. In Vercel’s December 2024 measurement, the crawlers of OpenAI, Anthropic and Perplexity did not run JavaScript, while Gemini, through Googlebot, and Applebot did. If your text is added by scripts after the page loads, use server-side rendering or prerendering for the pages you want quoted.

09Do AI Overviews reduce traffic to my website?

For many informational searches, yes. Pew Research Center found users clicked a traditional result on 8% of visits that showed an AI summary, against 15% without one. Ahrefs found the top-ranked page’s click-through rate on keywords with an AI Overview was 58% below its forecast from December 2023 data, a correlation. Commercial and local searches can behave differently, so check your own Search Console data.

10How long does GEO take to work?

Access fixes can take effect within days, once crawlers revisit; OpenAI says robots.txt changes for its search bot take about 24 hours. Content changes show as pages are recrawled, usually over weeks. Earned mentions and reviews build over months. Plan on six months before judging the trend.

11Can an agency guarantee my business will appear in AI answers?

No. Each engine chooses its own sources, and answers vary from one run to the next even for the same question. An honest agency can improve the odds and show you the trend over time. Treat any guarantee of ChatGPT or AI Overview placement as a warning sign.

12How do I check whether AI assistants mention my business?

Write down 20 to 30 questions your buyers ask, run each one by hand in ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google, and record who is named and which sources are cited, with the date. Repeat monthly with the same questions. Check each service’s terms of use before using any tool that queries it automatically. Doing it by hand avoids the question.

13What kind of content gets cited in AI answers?

In the KDD 2024 GEO study, pages that cited sources, quoted people and included specific statistics gained the most visibility, by about 30 to 40%. Pages that answer a question directly, use the words buyers use, and are backed by independent mentions are the ones an engine can quote with confidence.

14When is GEO not worth doing yet?

When your site is not indexed, when a local business has no Google Business Profile, when your offer is unclear, or when your buyers do not research online. Fix the foundations or the offer first. GEO amplifies a business that is already easy to understand. It does not make one.

Free checklist

The one-page GEO readiness checklist we use on every audit.

Robots.txt lines for the AI search bots
Firewall and bot-protection checks
Name, address and description sheet
Answer-first page template
Evidence checklist for every key page
Thirty buyer questions to test by hand

Request the checklist → One page, sent by a Clickhouse strategist. Ask for it in the form below.

09 / Who built this

[name, role]Strategy lead, GEO

[name, role]Technical SEO and content

Who built this tool

Clickhouse Media, Nicosia.

Clickhouse is a strategy-first marketing agency. Decisions before deliverables: we decide what a business should be known for, and by whom, then build the pages and the proof that make search engines and AI assistants say so. We measure the result in inquiries, customers, revenue and margin, not likes.

Based inNicosia, Cyprus Works withBusinesses in Cyprus and internationally, including the US LanguagesEnglish and Greek Websiteclickhouse.media MethodEvery figure on this page traced to its source, re-checked each quarter

Can AI assistants find, trust and quote your business?

The GEO readiness audit.

Crawlability and access

Entity clarity and consistency

Answer-first content